Refrigeration Display Cases
Brand | Model | Cabinet type | Temp Class | TDA (m2) | Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | TEC/TDA (kWh/day /m2) | Budget Price ($) | Elec Price (c/kWh) |
Brand | |
Model | |
Cabinet type | |
Temp Class | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA (kWh/day/m2) | |
Budget Price ($) | |
Elec Price (c/kWh) |
Efficiency level | Lifespan (Years) | Cabinet type | Temp Class | TDA (m2) | Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | TEC/TDA (kWh/day /m2) | Budget Price ($) | Elec Price (c/kWh) |
Efficiency level | |
Lifespan (Years) | |
Cabinet type | |
Temp Class | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA (kWh/day/m2) | |
Budget Price ($) | |
Elec Price (c/kWh) |
ROI Chart based on initial investment and energy savings
Annual Return on Additional Capital
Risk profile of registration data | ||
More Information |
Very low: Independent testing by National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) accredited laboratory; or an equivalent laboratory accredited by an organisation included in the Mutual Recognition Arrangements published by NATA.
Low – Test reports not independent, undertaken by supplier/manufacturer in Non Article 5 Country (i.e. Australia, New Zealand, Germany, United Kingdom) and Declaration of Compliance provided.
Low to medium: Test reports not independent, undertaken by local manufacturer and Declaration of Compliance not provided.
Medium: Test reports not independent, prepared by large enterprise in Article 5 Country (i.e. China). Declaration of Compliance not provided.
High: Test reports not independent, prepared by small to medium sized enterprise in Article 5 Country (i.e. China). Declaration of Compliance not provided.
Simulation: Published results are based on simulations in accordance with the relevant Australian and/or International technical standards.
Rank | Cabinet type | M-package temperature class | Brand | Model Number | TDA (m2) | Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | TEC/TDA | MEPS | Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) | |
Rank | |
Cabinet type | |
M-package temperature class | |
Brand | |
Model Number | |
TDA (m2) | |
Total Energy Consumption (kWh/day) | |
TEC/TDA | |
MEPS | |
Efficiency Improvement versus MEPS Compliant Equipment (%) |